ARNACA

American Journal of Advances in Medical Science

Reviewer information

Dr. Hesham A. El Enshasy

Malaysia

 

Dr. Zahid Manzoor

Pakistan

 

Dr. Hossein Nahrevanian

Iran

 

Dr Kartheek R Balapala

India

 

Dr PJ Hisalkar

India

 

Dr. Francesco Massoni

Italy

 

Dr Abu Ubaida Siddiqui

India

 

Dr. Mohammad Zubair

India

 

Dr. R. Kalyani

India

 

Dr. Raj Kiran Chitumalla

India

 

Dr. Mithun sikdar

India

 

Dr.Sunil Jurel

India


Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of scrutinizing author's scholarly work, research or ideas by  the of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing  work is published in a journal. Peer review is carried by  a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform impartial review.  This process encourages authors to meet the accepted standards of their discipline and prevents the dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, and unacceptable interpretations. As it is difficult for authors and researchers, whether individually or in a team to spot every mistake or flaw in a complicated piece of work, it is advocated that peer reviewing process will increases the probability that weaknesses will be identified and improved.

ARNACA recognizes the value and importance of the reviewer in the overall publication process not only in shaping the individual manuscript, but also in shaping the credibility and reputation of a journal. ARNACA seeks applicants interested in serving as reviewers.  We are looking for interested professionals and reviewers-

• Who have a substantial paper reviewing experience

• Who can follow the different criteria for submission of manuscripts and instruction for authors of quality journals

• Who have experience in ethical values of a research study, and confidentiality concerns in clinical trials or similar studies

• Who are willing to dedicate time for reviewing of articles.

• Willing to review or re-review an average of 2-3 submissions per year

• Capable of conducting quick reviews of submitted manuscript

Benefits

Best Reviewers will be selected once a year based upon their constructive criticism, effective comments, suggestions and possible queries and they will be duly recognized and acknowledged.  Reviewers will receive an honorarium for reviews completed within 10 working days.

Conflict-of-Interest:

We seek qualified unbiased reviewers. ARNACA requests reviewers to voluntarily reject the review of articles in which they have conflict of interest. We consider a conflict of interest to be

•             If you are Ph.D advisor (present) for any of the author/s of the article.

•             Family relations by blood, marriage or domestic partnership.

•             People whose research you fund or who funds you.

•             Author/s of the article with whom you believe you have conflict of interest.

Submission of CV:  Kindly submit your Curriculum Vitae (CV) by email to us which allows us to better access your areas of interest and expertise, in appointing you as reviewers. In your CV, kindly mention how many manuscripts you are willing to review each year.

Kindly send your CV to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Based on your willingness to review the submitted articles, you will electronically receive the articles. After peer review of articles, you are requested to kindly enter your in comments the Article review form and mail to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

Indexing

AJAMS is abstracted and indexed in

Directory of Science

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research

ResearchBib

JourInfo

Open J-Gate

Open Medical Abstracts

International Impact Factor Service

Academic Exchange Quarterly

Directory of Research Journal Indexing